CIT/CBI Bracketology Number 3 2019 February 2nd

By: Ethan Hennessy
We have now reached February most leagues are halfway done with conference play, so it is time to update the CIT/CBI bracketology. I am in my second season doing CIT/CBI bracketology for Happening Hoops. I do this because I genuinely enjoy following these tournaments, and believe they do not get a ton of coverage despite some good teams playing in them each year. In both 2017 and 2018 I was the first source to publicly break the majority of the fields for both tournaments.
In my final bracketology predictions for the 2018 fields I accurately predicted:
18/20 CIT teams and 9/16 CBI Teams.
The teams that get invited to these postseason tournaments are ones that failed to make the NCAA or NIT, and sometimes we do not know who is in and out of those tournaments until later in championship week. Also, teams must pay entry and hosting fees which deters some teams. Furthermore, in the CIT you are required a .500 record, and be a mid-major. Some coaches view these tournaments as good building blocks for their programs, and others do not, so that might lead one program to be more likely to turn down or accept a bid. Geography must also be factored into selection (you don’t want to have three teams on the west coast and all the rest on the east coast).
So with attempting to factor all of that information into this I will try to tell you who I think will be heading to the CIT and CBI this year. I also factor in which teams have accepted bids in the past years to one or both of the tournaments because that would indicate (assuming they meet the selection committee criteria) they are more likely to return. If they have long postseason droughts because this might make a team more likely to accept a bid to one of these tournaments. I will not consider teams that are leading their league at the time of this because they would be heading to the NCAA or NIT tournament (however we all know standings change often). Lastly, any inside information I hear about programs expressing interest in participating will be factored into these.
This season I am starting a new element of the bracketology I will be predicting a handful of bubble teams that are on the edge of making the NIT.
Bubble NIT Teams are teams I believe as of right now would make the NIT, or just barely miss the National Invitation Tournament, and then also decline a bid to either the CIT or CBI field. These teams are arranged from most likely to be in the NIT as an at large team to least likely (top to bottom).

  • UNCG (20-3 SoCon)
  • North Texas (18-4 CUSA)
  • Liberty (18-5 ASUN)
  • Murray State (16-4 OVC)
  • Belmont (16-4 OVC)
  • Rutgers (11-9 Big Ten)
  • Bowling Green (15-6 MAC)
  • Georgia Tech (11-10 ACC)

 

Any information on teams being offered, accepting, or declining bids to either tournament can be sent to HappeningHoops@gmail.com

 

With both CIT and CBI teams they are not organized in any particular way just in alphabetical order of conferences.

CIT (20 teams last season)

  • UMBC (14-9 America East)
  • NJIT (18-5 ASUN)
  • Montana (14-6 Big Sky)
  • Presbyterian (13-11 Big South)
  • Longwood (13-11 Big South)
  • UCSB (15-5 Big West)
  • UTSA (12-10 CUSA)
  • IUPUI (14-9 Horizon)
  • Penn (12-7 Ivy)
  • Central Michigan (15-6 MAC)
  • Akron (12-8 MAC)
  • Kent State (15-5 MAC)
  • North Carolina A&T (11-9 MEAC)
  • Drake (16-6 MVC)
  • Indiana State (11-10 MVC)
  • Saint Francis Brooklyn (13-9 NEC)
  • Austin Peay (15-7 OVC)
  • ETSU (18-5 SoCon)
  • Abilene Christian (18-4 Southland)
  • Fort Wayne (14-10 Summit)

 

CBI (16 teams last season)

  • UMass Lowell (12-10 America East)
  • South Florida (14-6 American)
  • Duquesne (15-6 Atlantic Ten)
  • Southern Utah (9-9 Big Sky)
  • Campbell (12-9 Big South)
  • College of Charleston (17-6 CAA)
  • Niagara (11-11 MAAC)
  • Miami Ohio (11-10 MAC)
  • Valparaiso (12-10 MVC)
  • Holy Cross (12-10 Patriot)
  • American (11-9 Patriot)
  • Furman (17-5 SoCon)
  • Loyola Marymount (16-6 WCC)
  • Pepperdine (11-11 WCC)
  • Seattle (13-9 WAC)
  • Utah Valley (16-7 WAC)

 

 

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: